Molly’s False Teeth & Lean

Lost false teeth

Yes, there is a connection between a lost set of false teeth and lean!

A few days before Christmas, my sister took Molly to the hospital emergency department from her care home. During the admission process, Molly’s false teeth went missing. I imagine that having no teeth would be stressful enough at any time of year but made worse by the thought of having to eat Christmas lunch out of a blender.

The nurses could not have been more helpful once they had realised Molly’s teeth were missing. They tried to work out what had happened and spent a lot of time looking for them.

In the Lean world, time spent looking for teeth is ‘non-value added’ time or ‘waste’. And it feels like a waste of time. Nurses’ time is valuable and better spent on nursing. Lean coaches help people look at processes from the customer’s point of view and how waste can be found and removed.

So how do false teeth go missing? Judging by the reaction of the nurses, it wasn’t the first time they had had to look for teeth. Problems usually occur when ‘things fall through the cracks’ or there is no clear process or responsibility for a task. All the individuals involved in a process may be doing their part exceptionally well, but something gets missed on a handover or when one person makes an assumption about what others might be doing. In most organisations the staff are good in their areas of expertise. In a hospital, the doctors, nurses and other staff are generally well trained, knowledgeable and experts at their job. Keeping false teeth safe does not require any technical expertise.

Value vs Waste

Most workplaces involve many processes. In manufacturing, the product moves through the plant from raw material from suppliers through to finished product delivered to the customer. We often call this process the value stream. Value is added along the way when the product is changed in a way the customer wants. There is also usually a lot of waste in the process, when the product is waiting, or being moved, or something is missing, or has to be reworked. This waste is all the stuff that normally happens which the customer is either unaware of or wouldn’t appreciate paying for. Customers are usually happy to pay for value. Wastes are the opportunities to improve.

In a hospital it is the patient who is the value stream. Value is added when the patient is being treated. Lots of professionals interact with the patient and do their part of the job well. That might be taking a temperature, administering drugs, assessing what to do next. But each time a patient moves from one person to another there is a risk that something gets missed. Which is why everything gets documented on the patient charts, the risk of mistakes being made is minimised.

Safety – quality – delivery – productivity KPIs in that order

In most workplaces, people are measured through KPIs (Key Performance Indicators).

Safety should of course be the top priority, and that would be equally true in a hospital as in a factory. As loose false teeth in a patient’s mouth is a hazard, then the teeth should be removed.

The next most important KPI is quality. Removing mistakes and the chance of mistakes being made. Hospitals are good at minimising the risk of a mistake causing medical harm. Keeping false teeth safe is perhaps not an urgent medical issue, but you could argue it could become a medical issue over time, so it’s important to keep them safe.

Delivery means shortening the time of the value chain. How can we get the patient through the admission process, through any treatment and back home in the shortest time. Often this is interpreted as needing to do work faster, but instead focussing on removing non-value added steps, or waste, can improve delivery times without sacrificing quality.

Productivity is the one measure that will improve on its own if quality and delivery are focussed on first. An example of this is the lost teeth. It might take an extra minute to bag and label Molly’s teeth when she was admitted, which if you’re being measured on how productive you are and you have some more urgent medical issues to address it might not be seen at the time as a priority. But how much time did the nurses spend looking for the teeth after they had gone missing?

There is a rule of thumb that if a task that takes 1 minute gets missed and goes to the next stage it takes at least 10 minutes to fix later. Keep multiplying by 10 as the problem goes further along the process. Getting it right first time and improving quality therefore directly improves productivity. But if you focus on productivity first, then quality can suffer. If an individual is measured on productivity and the KPI doesn’t include the time spent fixing up an error, then there is no incentive to do it right first time. Even if you know it’s the right thing to do, people will often do what they are measured to do, which is be ‘productive’.

Root Cause Analysis

There are two types of problems. Those you have seen before and those you haven’t. Typically when we ask people in their workplace about which types of problem they have the most, it’s the former. Molly wasn’t the first patient to have lost her teeth, so this wasn’t out of the blue, but a repeat problem. Family members who visit hospitals regularly know to take teeth home with them so they can’t get lost. Even a big sign in the waiting room saying “there is a good chance we will lose your loved one’s false teeth – please take their teeth home with you” might reduce the number of lost teeth. A sign like this would be what is generally called a quick fix to a problem. It’s a band aid solution until you investigate the root cause and come up with a countermeasure.

Why? not Who?

When something goes wrong, there should be an investigation. Unfortunately, this is often when everyone dives for cover so there’s no chance of them being blamed. There is no incentive for anyone to be open about what had happened and it’s hard to get to the bottom of what occurred. Instead of asking who did something, try asking why something occurred. Typically you ask why 5 times as you dig deeper to find out what has happened. You know you’re getting somewhere when you get past a person’s involvement and start looking at changes to processes to stop recurrence.

Go easy on the person and hard on the process

In getting to the root cause of the problem you have to go past blaming someone. It’s not the nurses’ fault, or my sister’s fault. If you keep asking why a problem occurred you will eventually come up with one of 3 causes:

1.       No Process

Is there are process for managing false teeth? If not, create a process, document it in a procedure and train everyone on the procedure.

2.       Ineffective process

Is the process any good or does it need to be modified to prevent teeth from getting lost? Auditing a process to see whether it is followed, and if not why not, can determine if the process actually works.

3.       Process in place but not followed

If there is a good, well documented process, why was it not followed? Does everyone know about it? If not check how people are trained. Does it need to be included in an induction training program?

If there is a good process, everyone knows about it but it was still not followed then you need to ask what is driving that behaviour. Often it’s because someone is pushed for time and it’s not seen as important. Realigning KPIs can help modify behaviour. For example if the nurses have a KPI around how fast they can admit a patient there may be incentive to take some short cuts that have no impact on the medical outcome, but may have an impact on the quality of the patient’s experience (such as losing false teeth).

Most people (me included) are in awe of what doctors and nurses do. It’s much closer to rocket science than keeping a set of false teeth safe. Which is why patients and their families are particularly frustrated with something like lost false teeth. Keeping teeth safe is not a hard thing to do on its own, but there are so many things that doctors and nurses need to do to keep their patients safe, keeping false teeth safe needs to fit into the overall process of caring for patients., with a process to follow.

It seems like there is a simple solution. Whenever you go into hospital they print lots of labels with your name and details on them. Why not have a ziplock bag for false teeth, hearing aids and other items and stick one of those stickers on it. Then have a safe place to put the bag. At least with a label if they did get lost, you’d know who to return them to.

On this occasion, Molly’s long hospital stay was remembered more for her not having her teeth than for the excellent medical care she received. The good news is that one of Molly’s sons found an old pair of teeth in time for her return to her care home, which made the move back a bit easier for Molly.

Covid-19 Testing & Lean

Artist impression of Corona virus
Artist impression of the corona virus

Over a Zoom coffee recently, a friend had been telling me about her day at work, which hadn’t been great. She works in a doctor’s surgery and had received numerous phone calls from people waiting for their Covid-19 test results. They had been told they would get their results in 2 days but the tests were taking longer. The patients had to self-isolate while the tests were being processed, which was at the very least frustrating and in many cases impacting on their work or health. It seemed that her job would be a lot less stressful and more productive if the tests could be sped up so she’d get fewer phone calls chasing test results.

Go easy on the person, hard on the process

So, what has this got to do with lean? Many think lean is just something to do with manufacturing, but the principles apply to any process. And getting Covid-19 tests done is a process.

It’s no-one’s fault that the tests were taking longer that the promised 2 days. Certainly not the fault of a receptionist on the other end of the phone. Or the nurse taking the test. Or the lab technician processing the test. It’s the process, or system that needs fixing.

What is a process? It’s just a series of steps between a supplier and customer. In the case of Covid-19 testing, the patient is both the supplier and the customer. The steps would be something like this:

  1. Patient’s swab is taken at clinic
  2. Enter test details into the computer
  3. Label, bag sample and put in out-tray
  4. Sample sits in out-tray until picked up by courier
  5. Courier sample over to lab
  6. Sample waits for machine to be free
  7. Process the sample through the test machine
  8. Enter test results into computer
  9. Provide test results to patient                  

Disclaimer – this is for illustrative purposes only to show how lean principles apply. And if this were for real, the people in the process, who know the details, would be the ones analysing it, not me. And each step would be further broken down and the time taken for each step noted. I’m just using Covid-19 testing as an example of a (non-manufacturing) process.

Bottlenecks & WIP

Any process will only be as fast as its slowest step – the constraint or bottleneck. Usually increasing the capacity of any step other than the bottleneck will not increase the overall capacity. It’s easy to tell which step is the bottleneck as the work-in-progress (WIP) piles up before it. There is no flow.

In the case of Covid-19 testing, many drive-through and other clinics opened up quickly and people were encouraged to get tested. If the capacity of taking swabs exceeds the swab processing capacity, then there was going to be a problem, which would only get worse over time as the swabs (WIP) build up.

The more tests you have backed up in front of the bottleneck, the worse things get. You may get queue-jumping for some tests which are seen to be more urgent. And as anyone who has been in a queue knows, that means that others in the queue will take longer.

In an ideal system, there is no queue. In practice there may be buffers between steps, but the amount is planned for – not just a pile of tests waiting.

I imagine that test machines are expensive and it is difficult to just build more in a hurry. And train more people to use them. But there are other ways to increase the capacity of a machine. You need to measure its uptime (also called OEE – overall equipment effectiveness). Is it running at 100%, no quality issues, no breakdowns? The time between tests, time setting up the machine, putting information into the system, checking names or other necessary paperwork are all opportunities to increase capacity quickly.

Pull vs Push

If testing capacity is increased through more drive-through and other clinics, these test swabs are ‘pushed’ onto the next step – processing the tests. Tests at clinics may be done as fast as possible, particularly if there is a target number to reach each day. Having a large pile of tests to process doesn’t make the processing any faster. It can even slow things down as there are more tests to sort through and possibly prioritise if some urgent ones come along. Or decide which to do first. Or be stressed by the big pile knowing everyone is relying on you to speed up, which is when mistakes can happen.  How do you ensure that there is ‘first in first out’ with a big unmanageable pile of tests to process? Test times will probably vary, so some customers will get their results sooner than others.

What can work better is using ‘pull’. You need to know the customer demand rate (how many tests do we need to get back to customers) and work back through the system at this same rate. Any constraints or bottlenecks within the system must operate at the required customer rate. The capacity of the bottleneck steps may need to be increased, but until you do that, it’s important to be honest with your customers. Only promise to deliver what you can achieve, which is the rate of tests through the bottleneck. Other steps in the process, which have more capacity than customer demand don’t have to run flat out. This bit is often hard to get your head around, but to optimise a process, some steps will slow down and that’s OK! It’s only the bottleneck that has to run flat out.  

Value vs Waste

Lean is a very simple concept. It looks for waste and reduces it. Waste is anything the customer doesn’t value. In the example of being tested for Covid-19, the only steps that add value are those in bold above – getting the swab taken, processing it through the testing machine and getting told about the result. If it takes 10 minutes to take a swab, 3 hours to process a test and 10 minutes to send a text result, then the value-add time is <4 hours. Even with a promised turnaround of 2 days, value is only being added 4/48 or 8% of the time. 92% of the time is waste such as waiting in a queue, waiting for the courier pick up time or being couriered to the lab. The longer the queue, the more waste and WIP and the longer it will take for someone to get their test results back.

So whether you’re involved in Covid-19 testing, manufacturing or any other business operation, you have processes. Understanding the steps in a process, the capacity of its bottleneck and applying lean principles can improve processes usually without spending a lot of money. There are benefits too as the customers’ experiences improve, which in turn leads to employees’ jobs being less frustrating and stressful. In the case of Covid-19 testing, there is no reason why a 2 day turnaround (or better) can’t be guaranteed as long as too many tests aren’t pushed into the system.

Let’s hope those involved with Covid-19 testing have a good understanding of the bottlenecks of their processes and have improved things, so my friend’s day at work will also improve. I’ll find out at our next coffee catch up, which happily will be in person, rather than via Zoom.

My Mini

A few months ago, I got a new Mini. Very exciting as my old car was almost 20 years old. Minis are made to order and shipped from England, so it was a 3 month wait. Worth it. But after a couple of weeks, the back bumper looked crooked and rubbed on the tailgate, causing the bumper to get scratched. I took it back to sales, who asked me to speak to warranty. Warranty passed me onto service. Mini service was being renovated, so I had to go to BMW service a couple of km away. Service took it in, gave me a BMW hire car and passed it onto their body shop. I rang service every week to see how my car was getting on and eventually 5 weeks later I was told that it had been fixed.

I went in to pick up my Mini and the bumper looked the same. Still crooked, but the scratch marks had disappeared. I pointed it out to the service man, who called over the warranty woman. They both looked at it and agreed that it had not been fixed. So I left in the hire BMW and my Mini went back to the body shop for another go. Another week later, I picked up my car. All fixed. But a few days later it was crooked again.

This time I went straight to the body shop. They fixed it on the spot. But after a few weeks later the bumper was crooked again and getting scratched again. I took it back (again). They booked it in for another visit to the body shop, another respray and I had another hire car for 2 days. This time, however, they appeared to get to the root cause of the problem – a faulty bumper clip – which they replaced. The bumper is now straight and doesn’t rub on the tailgate.

As a customer I had to deal with 4 departments: sales, warranty, service and body shop. They all had different priorities on cost, time and quality. Body shop told me they had a spare bumper and wanted to replace it, but warranty told them to fix the original. Service was telling body shop it was urgent, but there was no follow up to get it back to me. I just wanted my car fixed within a reasonable timeframe.

Some lean concepts or tools highlighted by this:

Value Stream Mapping – if Mini looked at the number of people that had to interact with the customer, they might reconsider their process.

Misaligned KPIs – warranty, body shop and service all appeared to have had different things being important to them.

Right First Time – obviously if the bumper had not been faulty at the beginning, there would have been huge cost savings for Mini/BMW.

Communication – So important. Communication both between departments and with the customer could have been better.

Waste – DOWNTIME – Defects, Overproduction, Waiting, Not utilising talent, Transport, Inventory, Motion, Excessive processing – at least 5 wastes identified here.

The whole experience did make me wonder whether Minis and BMWs were expensive because they were great cars and therefore provided value for money or whether they needed to cover the wastes in their processes.

I still love my Mini, though.